Extended Thought ▪ Where’s ESPN’s Competition?

By Matt Sussman | Wednesday, May 20th, 2009

espn_vs_vsFirst, there was CNN. And it was good. Good, but not great. But then Fox News and MSNBC came along and got their fair shares of the pie. And the competition made those cable news stations beacons of amazing programming in the eyes of the public.

Ick. Bad example.

But competition is good for television, and ESPN just doesn’t seem to have it. Fox Sports, Versus, and sport-specific channels are all that wage Nielsenesque wars on the Worldwide Leader In Sports. There’s just no broadcast channel or channels, unless draw battle lines between “Tiger and the field,” so to speak.

That’s not to say ESPN is untouchable. Their magazine and their website both have serious competitors and even superiors.

But where’s the Erdrick to TV’s Dragonlord? So far this guy appears to be the top opposition. Yikes.

Fox Sports seems content on dominating regional markets. Versus must be happy enough to monopolize the bullriding market. Actually, Vs. seems plucky enough to pull off a few shares off ESPN’s hairy back, since they already air college football and the NHL. But unfortunately they’d need more resources, such as money and broadcasters people have actually seen before.

The big thing, of course, is to pry some games away from ESPN’s broadcasting schedule. When ESPN is handing sacks of money to leagues and writing them notes about the most wonderful time they had last night, anything that isn’t a network station is only able to offer fat free yogurts.

In two years, the NBA collective bargaining agreement runs out. So does Versus’s contract with the NHL. If basketball enters a lockout or strike, and Versus renews their hockey contract, perhaps the league can collect castoff leagues like they were Sean Avery’s former Pokemon collection.

That’s not to say ESPN is horrible — some disagree — but sometimes they make some broadcast decisions that just make you sit there, jaw agape, doing your best Picard.

Perhaps the best-equipped [blush] organization to duel ESPN at high noon might be CNN/SI. Turner Broadcasting has been known to sit on the can and squeeze out another channel from time to time. The only dedicated Sports-O-Vision one they have is NBA TV, which is a start, but if SI became a channel, you could definitely see it picking up steam. The only problem is that TV channels, unlike website (bookmark thelayoffbeard.com today!) take a long time to permeate into cable boxes, hotels, and The People’s subconscious and DVRs.

But that might be what it takes to stop seeing news conveyed this.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 20th, 2009 and is filed under Extended Thought, Sports, TV. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Comments

  1. Robert on May 20th, 2009 at 4:41 pm

    But Suss, Turner already tried CNN/SI. Even being the exclusive outlet of Bobby Knight’s outlet for frustration with his players wasn’t enough to get it into more homes, and it faded into cable history in 2002.

    Of course, the broadcasting world of 2002 is a lot different than the broadcasting world of 2009. Digital TV was just starting out, and most stations building digital transmitters were more concerned with getting the primary digital signal on the air rather than programming their subchannels. Digital Cable was in its infancy; there weren’t a lot of people interested, therefore cramming a bunch of channels into digital tiers that only 4 or 5 people were hooked up to wasn’t a high priority. And Internet broadcasting? Forget about it; Excite @Home just went tits up leaving a lot of loyal subscribers in the lurch. DSL and Cable Internet were too expensive for a lot of people.

    If they’d just stuck it out a little longer (or started later) CNN/SI would probably still be around today, right next to the NFL Network on the Digital Sports tier and streaming online 24/7.

  2. Roy P.Talbot on December 24th, 2009 at 7:29 pm

    Thanks so much for this great post!
    i found a youtube video about watching tv online that I would like to share: international TV channels online.
    But seriously, great post and thanks so much !!
    i look forward to your next post !!
    :-)

  3. Julia Williamson on December 29th, 2009 at 1:39 am

    Advantageously, the article is really the freshest on this valuable topic. I concur with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your approaching updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the great clarity in your writing. I will instantly grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Good work and much success in your business efforts!

  4. Hotels Phangan on February 7th, 2010 at 5:13 pm

    Hey there,
    I really love this blog. Altavista sent me to this blog. I found so much good imformation here.
    Will surely visit it again.

  5. Hypnotice on March 8th, 2010 at 11:46 am

    Gday, I can’t recognise how to include your site in my rss reader. Can you Can be of help me, please

Leave a Reply